[ejabberd] privacy rules and invisibility

Sergei Golovan sgolovan at nm.ru
Fri Jul 22 20:16:40 MSD 2005


On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:11:14AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Aha, I was wrong, this is a client problem as the protocols are defined 
> right now. JEP-0126 states that it is the client's responsibility to 
> send directed "unavailable" presence when going invisible. Hmm. It would 
> be nice if the server did that when processing the privacy rule. Perhaps 
> we need to update JEP-0126 in this regard, because sending directed 
> presence to everyone in your roster is rather messy...

Then you'll have to update RFC 3921 which defines server behaviour. JEP-0126
just defines way of implementing invisibility.

-- 
Sergei 'TeopeTuK' Golovan


More information about the ejabberd mailing list