[ejabberd] ejabberd vs Jabber XCP

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri May 5 02:06:57 MSD 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joel Reymont wrote:
> 
> On May 4, 2006, at 10:57 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>>> Well, how does ejabberd measure against Jabber XCP?
>>
>> I have no idea since AFAIK no comparative tests have been done.
> 
> Well, how does it scale? Using what mechanism? The ejabberd side is
> clear to me but Jabber XCP is written in Java, right?

Jabber XCP is written in C.

You'd have to ask the folks at Jabber Inc. about scalability numbers and
mechanisms. They pay my salary (thus enabling me to work full time on
standardization of XMPP through the JSF and IETF), but I don't know all
about their products.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEWnsANF1RSzyt3NURAhimAKCoMXjs5nf+X8vCFleJCrsFvVC+7wCgpx2s
ItZBFCQsaja8YNK1R69qTSo=
=u3NI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.jabber.ru/pipermail/ejabberd/attachments/20060504/aec4b9d4/smime-0001.bin


More information about the ejabberd mailing list