AW: [ejabberd] ejabberd vs Jabber XCP

Joel Reymont joelr1 at gmail.com
Fri May 5 14:54:24 MSD 2006


On May 5, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Pieter Rautenbach wrote:

> USER     PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
> ejabberd 16   0 5344m 3.2g 1532 D  7.8 83.6  1363:02  beam

This is likely a 64-bit AMD machine, is it? If so then 64-bit  
accounts for the extra memory use. According to Mickael it's mostly  
due to using strings. Strings are lists of words and words in your  
case are 64-bit. Ouch!

--
http://wagerlabs.com/







More information about the ejabberd mailing list