[ejabberd] Preferred MUC clustering method

Lee Azzarello lee at dropio.com
Thu Mar 19 22:19:37 MSK 2009


That's it. You should test this before putting it into production, of course.

-lee

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Eric Rivas <kc2hmv at jla.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> I have muc_rooms listed as disc_copies on both nodes.  Is there more to it
> than that?
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Lee Azzarello wrote:
>
>> Store the muc rooms on disk on both nodes.
>>
>> -lee
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Eric Rivas <kc2hmv at jla.rutgers.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've setup a two node ejabberd cluster with clustered mod_muc.  I would
>>> like
>>> to set it up so if any node fails, the other can resume with limited
>>> degradation (complete with mucs).
>>>
>>> Right now, I have it so that most mnesia table is duplicated on each node
>>> (I
>>> basically did an add_table_copy with the same table type on the second
>>> node).
>>>
>>> I had an incident where both node were brought down. I brought up the
>>> second
>>> node and it appears that the persistent mucs were not showing up. Does
>>> anyone know of a way to remedy this?
>>>
>>> The cluster is using ejabberd-2.0.4.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Rivas
>>> kc2hmv at jla.rutgers.edu
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ejabberd mailing list
>>> ejabberd at jabber.ru
>>> http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ejabberd mailing list
>> ejabberd at jabber.ru
>> http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
>>
>
> --
> Eric Rivas
> kc2hmv at jla.rutgers.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> ejabberd mailing list
> ejabberd at jabber.ru
> http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
>
>


More information about the ejabberd mailing list