[ejabberd] privacy lists in 2.1.6

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Sun Apr 24 21:33:55 MSD 2011


On 03/25/2011 05:30 PM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 05:02 PM, Badlop wrote:
>> 2011/3/25 Yann Leboulanger<asterix at lagaule.org>:
>>> If I setup a rule that deny all that have subscription=none to send
>>> me iq,
>>> that also prevents ejabberd to reply to my disco#info request for
>>> example.
>>> And that's not conform with RFC that says that all<iq> MUST have a
>>> reply.
>>
>> But the same RFC says in
>> http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3921.html#rfc.section.10.2 that:
>>> Privacy lists MUST be the first delivery rule applied by a server,
>>> superseding ...
>
> Yes I understand, but if you use tkabber with its antispam rule
> (blocking everything from contacts with subscription = none) you cannot
> know the features of your own server (including if it supports privacy
> lists) so many features are disabled (vcard, proxy, server side history,
> ...) and you cannot even log with Gajim at least, which waits for the
> disco#info iq it sent.
>
> So it makes this antispam rule not usable at all.
>

So will there be something done to "fix" this issue? like not blocking 
stanza from server to client? there can't be spam from our own server. 
Or we'll choose another server.

-- 
Yann


More information about the ejabberd mailing list