[ejabberd] privacy lists in 2.1.6

Yann Leboulanger asterix at lagaule.org
Sun Apr 24 21:33:55 MSD 2011

On 03/25/2011 05:30 PM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 05:02 PM, Badlop wrote:
>> 2011/3/25 Yann Leboulanger<asterix at lagaule.org>:
>>> If I setup a rule that deny all that have subscription=none to send
>>> me iq,
>>> that also prevents ejabberd to reply to my disco#info request for
>>> example.
>>> And that's not conform with RFC that says that all<iq> MUST have a
>>> reply.
>> But the same RFC says in
>> http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3921.html#rfc.section.10.2 that:
>>> Privacy lists MUST be the first delivery rule applied by a server,
>>> superseding ...
> Yes I understand, but if you use tkabber with its antispam rule
> (blocking everything from contacts with subscription = none) you cannot
> know the features of your own server (including if it supports privacy
> lists) so many features are disabled (vcard, proxy, server side history,
> ...) and you cannot even log with Gajim at least, which waits for the
> disco#info iq it sent.
> So it makes this antispam rule not usable at all.

So will there be something done to "fix" this issue? like not blocking 
stanza from server to client? there can't be spam from our own server. 
Or we'll choose another server.


More information about the ejabberd mailing list