[ejabberd] Any scalability limitations with mnesia as the backend vs postgres?

Daniel Dormont dan at greywallsoftware.com
Thu May 5 07:20:08 MSD 2011

I assume this is only in reference to the tables that could potentially be
orders of magnitude larger than the amount of users/activities on the live
system, correct? Such tables as passwd, roster, vcard etc. Since some tables
(session, muc_online_room etc) *have* to be in Mnesia, they're out of the
picture I guess, right?


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:20 PM, zhong ming wu <mr.z.m.wu at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Evgeniy Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I would not recommend mnesia in clustering environment due to bigger
> memory
> > consumption.
> I am interested in this topic.  How would you quantify bigger memory?
> If I can afford 1GB of memory for each instance in the cluster would
> that be enough for mnesia?
> Thanks
> mr. wu
> _______________________________________________
> ejabberd mailing list
> ejabberd at jabber.ru
> http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.jabber.ru/pipermail/ejabberd/attachments/20110504/c058f737/attachment.html>

More information about the ejabberd mailing list