[ejabberd] Clustering question...
felix at mate1inc.com
Sat May 5 00:48:59 MSK 2012
Thanks for your reply :)
I am actually launching ejabberd as root, which is probably not a good
idea, but that's the way the binary installer set it up (it did not create
an ejabberd user, like apt-get does, but I wanted 2.1.10 and apt-get was
giving me an older version...). I should definitely set this up more
appropriately at some point, but I found out what's causing the issue and
it's not related to this.
I checked the cookie and they're identical on my two nodes. I was also
seeing the two nodes in the web admin interface, so it SEEMED like the
clustering was done properly, but there is something that was not correct.
I followed this guide to configure the nodes:
But there is something that this guide does not mention, which seems pretty
evident in retrospect, but since it was not explicitly mentioned, I didn't
think of doing it.
The guide instructed me to modify the ejabberdctl script on node #2 so that
it has the following extra parameter:
*-mnesia extra_db_nodes "['ejabberd at ejabberd1']"*
After doing this, I saw node #2 coming up in the web admin interface, so I
thought everything was ok, but it was not ok, because I also needed to add
this parameter to node #1's startup script (while mentioning that the
extra_db_node is node #2, and not itself, obviously).
Doing this made the clustering actually happen for real. After this, the
status command outputted correct values on both nodes, and I could bring
down any one node, and the other would keep serving chat messages. (The
connected clients would be disconnected and reconnect automatically to the
remaining alive node, but that is all right.)
Now, having different configurations embedded in the ejabberdctl script of
each node is not really convenient, so I tried having a uniform script
instead, where all nodes mention all nodes (including themselves) in the
extra_db_nodes parameter, and that seems to work correctly, so I'm planning
to leave it this way.
I really wish there was a complete and accurate guide to clustering
ejabberd, because the official ejabberd administration guide does not go in
depth and is missing some important pieces of information. Making this
clustering work required a lot of guess work.
I think the guide I provided a link to above, along with the clarification
I just mentioned, should be enough for someone else to get it up and
running, but it'd be nice to have this in the official doc!
The mnesia replication also requires a fair amount of guesswork, and while
I think my choices are ok, I'm afraid I might only discover that something
is problematic once we're already in production. A default, official, up to
date, recommended clustered mnesia configuration would be nice to have as
Anyway, thanks again for your help! I didn't know about the debug command
and poking around with it indirectly lead me to figure out what was going
on :) ...
Hopefully, this post might save someone else some headaches :)
Cheers ;) !
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Michael Weibel <michael.weibel at gmail.com>wrote:
> > sudo ./ejabberdctl status I get:
> > The node ejabberd at jabber2 is started with status: started
> > ejabberd is not running in that node
> > Check for error messages: /opt/ejabberd-2.1.10/logs/ejabberd.log
> > or other files in that directory.
> > Commands to start an ejabberd node:
> > start Start an ejabberd node in server mode
> > debug Attach an interactive Erlang shell to a running ejabberd node
> > live Start an ejabberd node in live (interactive) mode
> I assume you're running ejabberd as the user ejabberd. If you do a sudo
> ejabberdctl status, it could be possible that it takes a different
> .erlang.cookie than ejabberd. This way, ejabberdctl can't get the status.
> Usually erlang cookies in $HOME/.erlang.cookie. But it may be that there
> are also other places where the erlang cookie is stored.
> If you do a ejabberdctl debug, you can open a shell attached to the
> ejabberd process. There you can get the cookie value by using
> "erlang:get_cookie().". (Btw to close the shell: 2x ctrl+c)
> Maybe that helps you.
> > Whereas on jabber1.dev, the same command gives me:
> > The node ejabberd at jabber1 is started with status: started
> > ejabberd 2.1.10 is running in that node
> > Is there someone that can help me debug this problem...?
> > I can provide other informations if the above is not sufficient...!
> > Thanks a lot :) !!
> > --
> > Felix
> > _______________________________________________
> > ejabberd mailing list
> > ejabberd at jabber.ru
> > http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
> ejabberd mailing list
> ejabberd at jabber.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ejabberd